• Emerg Med Australas · Dec 2007

    External validation of the Best Guess formulae for paediatric weight estimation.

    • Anne-Maree Kelly, Debra Kerr, Megan Clooney, David Krieser, and Kevin Nguyen.
    • Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Victoria, Australia. anne-maree.kelly@wh.org.au
    • Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Dec 1;19(6):543-6.

    ObjectiveA new method for estimation of weight in children based on their age has been proposed. The present study aims to validate the Best Guess formulae in a new population of children.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of a database collected for a prospective, observational, cohort study conducted in the Paediatric ED of Sunshine Hospital. Children aged 1-11 years who presented to the ED between 18 August 2005 and 25 February 2006 were included. Actual weight, height, age and ethnicity were obtained. Agreement between estimated weight using the Best Guess formulae and measured weight is reported using mean bias, 95% limits of agreement and proportion within 20% of actual weight.ResultsA total of 410 cases were included in the present study. Forty-six per cent were female and median age was 4 years. The mean bias in the 1-5 year group was 0.9 kg, with 95% limits of agreement -3.5 to +5.3 kg. Seventy-six per cent of estimations were within 20% of measured weight. The mean bias in the 5-11 year group was 0.4 kg, with 95% limits of agreement -14.4 to +15.2 kg. In this group, 64% of estimations were within 20% of measured weight.ConclusionThe Best Guess formulae performed moderately well in estimating children's weight, but had a tendency to overestimate weight, particularly in children with lower body mass index.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…