• Karen Sepucha, HanPaul K JPKJCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA., Yuchiao Chang, Steven J Atlas, Neil Korsen, Lauren Leavitt, Vivian Lee, Sanja Percac-Lima, Brittney Mancini, James Richter, Elizabeth Scharnetzki, Lydia C Siegel, K D Valentine, Kathleen M Fairfield, and Leigh H Simmons.
• Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Health Decision Sciences Center, Boston, MA, USA. ksepucha@mgh.harvard.edu.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb 1; 38 (2): 406413406-413.

BackgroundFor adults aged 76-85, guidelines recommend individualizing decision-making about whether to continue colorectal cancer (CRC) testing. These conversations can be challenging as they need to consider a patient's CRC risk, life expectancy, and preferences.ObjectiveTo promote shared decision-making (SDM) for CRC testing decisions for older adults.DesignTwo-arm, multi-site cluster randomized trial, assigning physicians to Intervention and Comparator arms. Patients were surveyed shortly after the visit to assess outcomes. Analyses were intention-to-treat.Participants And SettingPrimary care physicians affiliated with 5 academic and community hospital networks and their patients aged 76-85 who were due for CRC testing and had a visit during the study period.InterventionsIntervention arm physicians completed a 2-h online course in SDM communication skills and received an electronic reminder of patients eligible for CRC testing shortly before the visit. Comparator arm received reminders only.Main MeasuresThe primary outcome was patient-reported SDM Process score (range 0-4 with higher scores indicating more SDM); secondary outcomes included patient-reported discussion of CRC screening, knowledge, intention, and satisfaction with the visit.Key ResultsSixty-seven physicians (Intervention n=34 and Comparator n=33) enrolled. Patient participants (n=466) were on average 79 years old, 50% with excellent or very good self-rated overall health, and 66% had one or more prior colonoscopies. Patients in the Intervention arm had higher SDM Process scores (adjusted mean difference 0.36 (95%CI (0.08, 0.64), p=0.01) than in the Comparator arm. More patients in the Intervention arm reported discussing CRC screening during the visit (72% vs. 60%, p=0.03) and had higher intention to follow through with their preferred approach (58.0% vs. 47.1, p=0.03). Knowledge scores and visit satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms.ConclusionPhysician training plus reminders were effective in increasing SDM and frequency of CRC testing discussions in an age group where SDM is essential.Trial RegistrationThe trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03959696).© 2022. The Author(s).

12 keywords...

hide…