• Nicholas E Ingraham, Emma K Jones, Samantha King, James Dries, Michael Phillips, Tyler Loftus, Heather L Evans, Genevieve B Melton, and Christopher J Tignanelli.
• Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Minneapolis, MN.
• Ann. Surg. 2023 Mar 1; 277 (3): 359364359-364.

ObjectiveWe critically evaluated the surgical literature to explore the prevalence and describe how equity assessments occur when using clinical decision support systems.BackgroundClinical decision support (CDS) systems are increasingly used to facilitate surgical care delivery. Despite formal recommendations to do so, equity evaluations are not routinely performed on CDS systems and underrepresented populations are at risk of harm and further health disparities. We explored surgical literature to determine frequency and rigor of CDS equity assessments and offer recommendations to improve CDS equity by appending existing frameworks.MethodsWe performed a scoping review up to Augus 25, 2021 using PubMed and Google Scholar for the following search terms: clinical decision support, implementation, RE-AIM, Proctor, Proctor's framework, equity, trauma, surgery, surgical. We identified 1415 citations and 229 abstracts met criteria for review. A total of 84 underwent full review after 145 were excluded if they did not assess outcomes of an electronic CDS tool or have a surgical use case.ResultsOnly 6% (5/84) of surgical CDS systems reported equity analyses, suggesting that current methods for optimizing equity in surgical CDS are inadequate. We propose revising the RE-AIM framework to include an Equity element (RE 2 -AIM) specifying that CDS foundational analyses and algorithms are performed or trained on balanced datasets with sociodemographic characteristics that accurately represent the CDS target population and are assessed by sensitivity analyses focused on vulnerable subpopulations.ConclusionCurrent surgical CDS literature reports little with respect to equity. Revising the RE-AIM framework to include an Equity element (RE 2 -AIM) promotes the development and implementation of CDS systems that, at minimum, do not worsen healthcare disparities and possibly improve their generalizability.Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…