• Cory B McEvoy, Adam Crabtree, Jacob R Powell, James S Meabon, and Jason P Mihalik.
• United States Army Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, USA.
• J. Neurotrauma. 2023 Feb 1; 40 (3-4): 318325318-325.

AbstractSpecial Operations Forces (SOF) Service members endure frequent exposures to blast and overpressure mechanisms given their high training tempo. The link between cumulative subconcussive blasts on short- and long-term neurological impairment is largely understudied. Neurodegenerative diseases such as brain dysfunction, cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia may develop with chronic exposures. This hypothesis remains unproven because of lack of ecologically valid occupational blast exposure surveillance among SOF Service members. The purpose of the study was to measure occupational blast exposures in a close quarter battle (CQB) training environment and to use those outcomes to develop a pragmatic cumulative blast exposure (CBE) estimate model. Four blast silhouettes equipped with a field-deployable wireless blast gauge system were positioned in breaching positions during CQB training scenarios. Silhouettes were exposed to flashbangs and three interior breaching charges (single strand roll-up interior charge, 300 grain (gr) explosive cutting tape (ECT), and Jelly charge). Mean blast measures were calculated for each silhouette for flashbangs (n = 93), single strand roll-up interior charge (n = 80), 300 gr ECT (n = 28), and Jelly charge (n = 71). Mean peak blast pressures per detonation are reported as follows: (1) flashbangs (1.97 pounds per square inch [psi]); (2) single strand roll-up interior charge (3.88 psi); (3) 300 gr ECT (2.78 psi); and (4) Jelly charge (1.89 psi). Pragmatic CBE estimates for SOF Service members suggest 36.8 psi, 184 psi, and 2760 psi may represent daily, weekly, and training cycle cumulative pressure exposures. Estimating blast exposures during routine CQB training can be determined from empirical measures taken in CQB environments. Factoring in daily, weekly, training cycle, or even career length may reasonably estimate cumulative occupational training blast exposures for SOF Service members. Future work may permit more granular exposure estimates based on operational blast exposures and those experienced by other military occupational specialties.

14 keywords...

hide…