• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Oct 2022

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Randomised comparison between superior trunk and costoclavicular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A noninferiority study.

    • Yumin Jo, Chahyun Oh, Woo-Yong Lee, Hyung-Jin Chung, Juyeon Park, Yoon-Hee Kim, Youngkwon Ko, Woosuk Chung, and Boohwi Hong.
    • From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine (YJ, CO, JP, Y-HK, YK, WC, BH), Department of Orthopaedic surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, College of Medicine (W-YL, H-JC) and Biomedical Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea (YK, BH).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Oct 1; 39 (10): 810817810-817.

    BackgroundSuperior trunk block (STB) provides noninferior analgesia to the interscalene block and reduces the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP). Recently, supraclavicular spreading has also been shown to occur during costoclavicular block (CCB), presenting as an alternative analgesic technique for shoulder surgery.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in postoperative pain scores and HDP incidence between STB and CCB.DesignProspective randomised controlled trial.SettingChungnam National University Hospital in Daejeon from January to July 2021.PatientsSeventy patients, aged 20 to 70 years with ASA Physical Status classifications I to III and scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited.InterventionUltrasound-guided STB or CCB was performed with 20 ml 0.5% ropivacaine.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was the pain score (numeric rating scale, NRS) at 1 h postsurgery. A 1.4 (NRS) noninferiority margin was set a priori . The incidence of HDP, postoperative change of pulmonary function and postoperative opioid use were included as secondary outcomes.ResultsThe pain score was higher in the CCB group compared with the STB group at 1 h postoperatively (median difference, 2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1 to 3; noninferiority was not demonstrated). Two patients in the CCB group received a rescue interscalene block due to severe postoperative pain. The incidence of complete HDP was lower in the CCB group (risk difference, -26%; 95% CI, -6 to -45%; P  < 0.001). The median reduction in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were also significantly lower in the CCB group.ConclusionAlthough the incidence of HDP was lower, CCB did not show noninferiority in immediate postoperative analgesia compared with STB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinical Trial Registry of Korea (KCT0005822, principal investigator: Boohwi Hong) on 25 January 2021 ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ).Copyright © 2022 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.