-
- Chelsea S Harris, Victor F Froelicher, David Hadley, and Matthew T Wheeler.
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Electronic address: chelsea.harris@duke.edu.
- Am. J. Med. 2022 Dec 1; 135 (12): 14781487.e41478-1487.e4.
ObjectivesThe 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is used in the preparticipation screening examination for athletes. Despite known differences in ECG findings by sex, only QTc prolongation is given a sex-specific threshold. We hypothesize that our large dataset-with diversity in age, race, and sport participation-can be utilized to improve ECG screening in female student athletes.MethodsComputerized 12-lead ECGs were recorded and analyzed in female athletes who underwent preparticipation screening examination between June 2010 and September 2021. The quantitative, empirical 2017 international criteria for electrocardiographic interpretation were compared with either the 99th percentile in our cohort or the percentile that corresponded to the known disease prevalence.ResultsOf 3466 female athletes with ECGs as part of preparticipation screening examination, the 2017 international criteria classified 2.1% of athletes with at least one ECG abnormality requiring cardiological evaluation. Rates were similar across age, race/ethnicity, and sporting discipline. Using ranges based on our population, 2.7% of athletes would require additional workup. Surprisingly, ST depression up to 0.03 mV was a normal finding in this cohort. If RS voltage extremes were considered findings requiring follow-up, an additional 9.6% of the athlete population would be flagged using current definitions. This number decreases to 2.7% if using the 99th percentile in this cohort.ConclusionThese results highlight a difference in the reported prevalence of ECG abnormalities when comparing empirically derived thresholds to statistically derived ranges. Consideration of new metrics specific to the female athlete population has the potential to further refine athlete ECG screening.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.