• Jianquan Zhao, Yichen Meng, Jun Ma, Xuhui Zhou, and Heng Jiang.
• Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, P.R.China.
• World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov 1; 167: e507e514e507-e514.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the traditional 2-rod correction technique with the sectional correction technique in terms of radiographic results and clinical outcomes for patients with dystrophic scoliosis caused by neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).MethodsFrom May 2015 to April 2018, 53 patients with dystrophic scoliosis caused by NF1 underwent 1-stage posterior corrective surgery. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on technique: the sectional correction technique (SC group) and the traditional 2-rod technique (TT group). Before surgery and at the final follow-up, the demographic information, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups using independent-sample t tests.ResultsThe SC group consisted of 24 patients, while the TT group consisted of 29 patients. Patients in the SC group showed a higher coronal balance distance after the operation (8.3 ± 8.2 mm vs. 16.2 ± 8.8 mm, P = 0.002) and at the final follow-up (9.5 ± 9.3 mm vs. 19.3 ± 10.1 mm, P < 0.0001). At the last follow-up, the loss of correction in the SC group was 2.2 ± 0.9 and 2.1 ± 0.7 in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively, and these values were significantly lower than those in the TT group (5.3 ± 1.6 in the coronal plane and 4.5 ± 1.9 in the sagittal plane, both P < 0.05). The SC group had better improvement based on appearance and satisfaction score at the final follow-up.ConclusionsThe sectional correction technique using a concave domino connector can restore coronal imbalance and reduce the risk of implant failure.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…