• Takero Arai, Takashi Asai, and Yasuhisa Okuda.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minamikoshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
• J Anesth. 2022 Oct 1; 36 (5): 642-647.

AbstractA medical malpractice lawsuit may be brought against health care providers, if there was a possibility of a negligence, or failure to meet the standard of care. Recently, clinical practice guidelines have increasingly been used as evidence of the standard of care. Nevertheless, it is not clear whether these guidelines can be used as evidence of the standard of care. We carried out a snapshot study to know whether or not there were dissociations between the current standard of anesthesia care and recommendations made by clinical practice guidelines. We asked all the 80 heads of Anesthesiology departments of Japanese public and private Universities, to answer questions related to difficult airway management after induction of anesthesia, postoperative monitoring of breathing, and of the presence or the absence of neuropathy of the lower legs after regional anesthesia. The response rate was 71% (57/80). The majority of anesthesiologists had little experience with front-of-neck access in patient, and responders might frequently make repeated attempts at tracheal intubation. Postoperative monitoring was frequently not routinely performed. In conclusion, this study has shown that there may be various degrees of dissociations between the current standard of anesthesia care and the recommendations made by clinical practice guidelines that had been used as evidence of the standard of care in medical malpractice lawsuit cases in Japan.© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.

13 keywords...

hide…