• Jacob G Eide, Mandy K Salmon, Rijul S Kshirsagar, Tapan D Patel, Kathleen M Davin, Aman Prasad, Elizabeth M Stevens, Heather Ungerer, Auddie M Sweis, Tran B Locke, John Y Lee, M Sean Grady, Daniel Yoshor, Phillip B Storm, Nithin D Adappa, and James N Palmer.
• Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov 1; 167: e664e669e664-e669.

ObjectivesRathke cleft cysts (RCCs) arise from the development of the Rathke pouch. Recurrence is common after either drainage or cyst removal. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is increasingly utilized for the management of RCC. Various techniques have been described to try to reduce the rates of recurrence. We studied the effect of fenestration with a nasoseptal flap (NSF) on recurrence rates by comparing a cohort of patients undergoing this technique to a cohort of patients undergoing conventional drainage.MethodsPatients who underwent EEA for RCC between 2011 and 2020 were identified and divided into 2 cohorts: conventional fenestration versus fenestration with NSF. Surgical approach, reconstructive method, and recurrences were recorded. Primary end point was symptomatic or radiographic recurrence.Results21 patients were identified undergoing EEA. An NSF was used to line the cyst cavity in 11 cases. Conventional fenestration without mucosal reconstruction was performed in the remaining 10 cases. In the cases without NSF, 5 (50%) developed recurrence requiring revision surgery, while there was only one recurrence in the NSF group (P < 0.05). In patients requiring revision, all had an NSF placed and none had a second recurrence of their RCC.ConclusionsNSF placement into a fenestrated RCC is useful to prevent cyst reaccumulation and reoperation. Typical fenestration carries an unacceptably high rate of recurrence.Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

16 keywords...

hide…