You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.


  • Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg · Feb 2023

    Multicenter Study Observational Study

    Non-operative vs. operative treatment for multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

    • Ruben J Hoepelman, Frank J P Beeres, Reinier B Beks, Arthur A R Sweet, Frank F Ijpma, LansinkKoen W WKWWDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands., Bas van Wageningen, Tjarda N Tromp, Björn-Christian Link, Nicole M van Veelen, Jochem M Hoogendoorn, Mirjam B de Jong, Mark C P van Baal, LeenenLuke P HLPHDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands., GroenwoldRolf H HRHHDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands., and Roderick M Houwert.
    • Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. rjhoepelman@gmail.com.
    • Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Feb 1; 49 (1): 461471461-471.

    BackgroundPatients with multiple rib fractures without a clinical flail chest are increasingly being treated with rib fixation; however, high-quality evidence to support this development is lacking.MethodsWe conducted a prospective multicenter observational study comparing rib fixation to non-operative treatment in all patients aged 18 years and older with computed tomography confirmed multiple rib fractures without a clinical flail chest. Three centers performed rib fixation as standard of care. For adequate comparison, the other three centers performed only non-operative treatment. As such clinical equipoise formed the basis for the comparison in this study. Patients were matched using propensity score matching.ResultsIn total 927 patients with multiple rib fractures were included. In the three hospitals that performed rib fixation, 80 (14%) out of 591 patients underwent rib fixation. From the nonoperative centers, on average 71 patients were adequately matched to 71 rib fixation patients after propensity score matching. Rib fixation was associated with an increase in hospital length of stay (HLOS) of 4.9 days (95%CI 0.8-9.1, p = 0.02) and a decrease in quality of life (QoL) measured by the EQ5D questionnaire at 1 year of 0.1 (95% CI - 0.2-0.0, p = 0.035) compared to non-operative treatment. A subgroup analysis of patients who received operative care within 72 h showed a similar decrease in QoL. Up to 22 patients (28%) who underwent surgery experienced implant-related irritation.ConclusionsWe found no benefits and only detrimental effects associated with rib fixation. Based on these results, we do not recommend rib fixation as the standard of care for patients with multiple rib fractures.Trial RegistrationRegistered in the Netherlands Trial Register NTR6833 on 13/11/2017.© 2022. The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…