• Paul Friedman, Francis Murgatroyd, BoersmaLucas V ALVAFrom Mayo Clinic, Rochester (P.F.), and Medtronic, Mounds View (A.E.T., C.W., S.W.) - both in Minnesota; King's College Hospital, London (F.M.); the Cardiology Department, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (L.V.A.B.), and Amsterdam Univ, Jaimie Manlucu, David O'Donnell, Bradley P Knight, Nicolas Clémenty, Christophe Leclercq, Anish Amin, Béla P Merkely, Ulrika M Birgersdotter-Green, ChanJoseph Y SJYSFrom Mayo Clinic, Rochester (P.F.), and Medtronic, Mounds View (A.E.T., C.W., S.W.) - both in Minnesota; King's College Hospital, London (F.M.); the Cardiology Department, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (L.V.A.B.), and Amsterdam Univer, Mauro Biffi, Reinoud E Knops, Greg Engel, Ignacio Muñoz Carvajal, Laurence M Epstein, Venkata Sagi, Jens B Johansen, Maciej Sterliński, Clemens Steinwender, Troy Hounshell, Richard Abben, Amy E Thompson, Christopher Wiggenhorn, Sarah Willey, Ian Crozier, and Extravascular ICD Pivotal Study Investigators.
• From Mayo Clinic, Rochester (P.F.), and Medtronic, Mounds View (A.E.T., C.W., S.W.) - both in Minnesota; King's College Hospital, London (F.M.); the Cardiology Department, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (L.V.A.B.), and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (L.V.A.B., R.E.K.) - both in the Netherlands; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada (J.M.); Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia (D.O.); Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (B.P.K.); Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours-Hôpital Trousseau, Tours (N.C.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes-Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes (C.L.) - both in France; Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH (A.A.); Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (B.P.M.); the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (U.M.B.-G.), and Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City (G.E.) - both in California; Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (J.Y.S.C.); the Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (M.B.); Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain (I.M.C.); Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY (L.M.E.); Baptist Health, Jacksonville, FL (V.S.); Odense Universitetshospital, Odense, Denmark (J.B.J.); Klinika Zaburzeń Rytmu Serca/Narodowy Instytut Kardiologii-Stefana Kardynała Wyszyńskiego, Warsaw, Poland (M.S.); Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria (C.S.); the Iowa Heart Center, West Des Moines (T.H.); the Cardiovascular Institute of the South, Houma, LA (R.A.); and Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand (I.C.).
• N. Engl. J. Med. 2022 Oct 6; 387 (14): 1292-1302.

BackgroundThe extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has a single lead implanted substernally to enable pause-prevention pacing, antitachycardia pacing, and defibrillation energy similar to that of transvenous ICDs. The safety and efficacy of extravascular ICDs are not yet known.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, single-group, nonrandomized, premarket global clinical study involving patients with a class I or IIa indication for an ICD, all of whom received an extravascular ICD system. The primary efficacy end point was successful defibrillation at implantation. The efficacy objective would be met if the lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the percentage of patients with successful defibrillation was greater than 88%. The primary safety end point was freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications at 6 months. The safety objective would be met if the lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the percentage of patients free from such complications was greater than 79%.ResultsA total of 356 patients were enrolled, 316 of whom had an implantation attempt. Among the 302 patients in whom ventricular arrhythmia could be induced and who completed the defibrillation testing protocol, the percentage of patients with successful defibrillation was 98.7% (lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 96.6%; P<0.001 for the comparison with the performance goal of 88%); 299 of 316 patients (94.6%) were discharged with a working ICD system. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients free from major system- or procedure-related complications at 6 months was 92.6% (lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 89.0%; P<0.001 for the comparison with the performance goal of 79%). No major intraprocedural complications were reported. At 6 months, 25 major complications were observed, in 23 of 316 patients (7.3%). The success rate of antitachycardia pacing, as assessed with generalized estimating equations, was 50.8% (95% CI, 23.3 to 77.8). A total of 29 patients received 118 inappropriate shocks for 81 arrhythmic episodes. Eight systems were explanted without extravascular ICD replacement over the 10.6-month mean follow-up period.ConclusionsIn this prospective global study, we found that extravascular ICDs were implanted safely and were able to detect and terminate induced ventricular arrhythmias at the time of implantation. (Funded by Medtronic; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04060680.).Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.

18 keywords...

hide…