• Critical care medicine · Jun 1996

    Comparative Study

    Private attending physician status and the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions in a medical intensive care unit population.

    • M H Kollef.
    • Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
    • Crit. Care Med. 1996 Jun 1;24(6):968-75.

    ObjectiveTo assess the influence of private attending physician status on the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions among patients dying within a medical intensive care unit (ICU).DesignRetrospective cohort analysis.SettingAn academic tertiary care center.PatientsOne hundred fifty-nine consecutive patient deaths occurring in the medical ICU during a 12-month period.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsWithdrawal of life-sustaining interventions (i.e., mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and/or vasopressors), duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, medical care costs, and patient charges were recorded. Life sustaining interventions were actively withdrawn from 69 (43.4%) patients prior to death. Patients without a private attending physician were significantly more likely to undergo the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions compared with patients having a private attending physician (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% confidence interval = 1.8, 3.6, respectively; p = .005). A correlation was found between the possession of private health insurance and private attending physician status (r2 = .39, p < .001). Multiple logistic regression analysis was subsequently used to control for demographic factors and severity of illness. Three independent predictors for the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions were identified in this patient cohort (p < .05) having a planned therapeutic trial of life-sustaining interventions outlined in the medical record (adjusted odds ratio 9.4; 95% confidence interval = 5.6 to 15.6; p < .001); lack of a private attending physician (adjusted odds ratio = 4.4; 95% confidence interval = 2.9 to 6.5; p < .001); and the presence of clearly defined advance directives regarding patient preferences for medical care (adjusted odds ratio = 3.6; 95% confidence interval = 2.3 to 5.7; p. = .005). Patients with private attending physicians had significantly greater medical care costs and medical care charges compared with patients without a private attending physician.ConclusionAmong patients dying within a medical ICU, those patients without a private attending physician are more likely to undergo the active withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.