• Am. J. Crit. Care · Sep 2022

    Review

    A Pediatric Intensive Care Checklist for Interprofessional Rounds: The R-PICniC Study.

    • Daniela Fernanda Dos Santos Alves, Érika Sana Moraes, ContiPatrícia Blau MargosianPBMPatrícia Blau Margosian Conti is a PhD student, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas., Giselli Cristina Villela Bueno, Tiago Henrique de Souza, Elisandra Oliveira Parada Pereira, Marcelo Barciela Brandão, PeterliniMaria Angélica SorginiMASMaria Angélica Sorgini Peterlini is a professor of pediatric nursing, São Paulo School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo., and PedreiraMavilde Luz GonçalvesMLGMavilde Luz Gonçalves Pedreira is a professor of pediatric nursing, São Paulo School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo..
    • Daniela Fernanda dos Santos Alves is a professor of pediatric nursing, School of Nursing, State University of Campinas, Brazil, and a postdoctorate fellow, São Paulo School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
    • Am. J. Crit. Care. 2022 Sep 1; 31 (5): 383389383-389.

    BackgroundThe use of checklists in the pediatric intensive care unit can help improve the quality of care and patient safety.ObjectivesTo build and validate a checklist for use in interprofessional rounds in a pediatric intensive care unit.MethodsThis methodological study was conducted in a 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit serving children up to 14 years old. A checklist prototype was constructed through review of the literature and achievement of consensus among the professionals providing care in the unit. Content validation was performed using a modified Delphi technique involving specialists with more than 5 years of experience in pediatric intensive care, methodological studies, and patient safety. Content validity ratios were calculated for the elements of the checklist, which were considered valid when they reached values greater than 0.78. The checklist was tested for usability, application time, and effects on patient care, and feedback was obtained from potential users.ResultsBefore content validation, the checklist contained 11 domains, 32 items, and 6 daily goals. The invitation to validate content was sent to 86 specialists, and content validity was achieved after 2 rounds of evaluation, with the checklist elements having content validity ratios ranging from 0.94 to 0.97. The mean application time of the checklist was 5 minutes. The final version consisted of 11 domains, 33 items, and 8 daily goals.ConclusionsThis study resulted in a useful and valid instrument for application in interprofessional rounds that was tailored to the needs of local health care professionals.©2022 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.