• BMC anesthesiology · Sep 2022

    Machine learning prediction of postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events in geriatric patients: a prospective cohort study.

    • Xiran Peng, Tao Zhu, Tong Wang, Fengjun Wang, Ke Li, and Xuechao Hao.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, PO Box 610041, Chengdu, China.
    • BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Sep 10; 22 (1): 284.

    BackgroundPostoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) account for more than one-third of perioperative deaths. Geriatric patients are more vulnerable to postoperative MACEs than younger patients. Identifying high-risk patients in advance can help with clinical decision making and improve prognosis. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for the preoperative prediction of postoperative MACEs in geriatric patients.MethodsWe collected patients' clinical data and laboratory tests prospectively. All patients over 65 years who underwent surgeries in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 25, 2019 to June 29, 2020 were included. Models based on extreme gradient boosting (XGB), gradient boosting machine, random forest, support vector machine, and Elastic Net logistic regression were trained. The models' performance was compared according to area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Brier score. To minimize the influence of clinical intervention, we trained the model based on undersampling set. Variables with little contribution were excluded to simplify the model for ensuring the ease of use in clinical settings.ResultsWe enrolled 5705 geriatric patients into the final dataset. Of those patients, 171 (3.0%) developed postoperative MACEs within 30 days after surgery. The XGB model outperformed other machine learning models with AUPRC of 0.404(95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.219-0.589), AUROC of 0.870(95%CI: 0.786-0.938) and Brier score of 0.024(95% CI: 0.016-0.032). Model trained on undersampling set showed improved performance with AUPRC of 0.511(95% CI: 0.344-0.667, p < 0.001), AUROC of 0.912(95% CI: 0.847-0.962, p < 0.001) and Brier score of 0.020 (95% CI: 0.013-0.028, p < 0.001). After removing variables with little contribution, the undersampling model showed comparable predictive accuracy with AUPRC of 0.507(95% CI: 0.338-0.669, p = 0.36), AUROC of 0.896(95%CI: 0.826-0.953, p < 0.001) and Brier score of 0.020(95% CI: 0.013-0.028, p = 0.20).ConclusionsIn this prospective study, we developed machine learning models for preoperative prediction of postoperative MACEs in geriatric patients. The XGB model showed the best performance. Undersampling method achieved further improvement of model performance.Trial RegistrationThe protocol of this study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (15/08/2019, ChiCTR1900025160).© 2022. The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.