-
- Mary Ellen Murray and Jeffrey B Henriques.
- School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, K6/340 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-2455, USA. memurra1@facstaff.wisc.edu
- Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jul 1; 9 (7): 512-8.
ObjectiveTo determine the costs associated with conducting concurrent utilization review, a utilization management strategy widely used by the managed care industry.Study DesignA production process model focusing on resource utilization.SubjectsThe 29 clinical services of a 500-bed academic health center were aggregated into 9 clinical groups. A random sample of at least 15 reviews per group was studied.MethodsTime sampling and cost analysis methods were used to determine the cost to the hospital of conducting utilization review. Component activities of the process were identified and analyzed to determine differences among clinical services and among the component tasks of the utilization review process.ResultsIn 12 months, 13 126 reviews were completed in an average of 15 minutes 41 seconds. Across clinical groups, the average total time of each review ranged from 11 minutes 18 seconds (medical group) to 19 minutes 4 seconds (pediatrics group). Significant differences existed among clinical service groups for the activity of preparing for conducting the review, with the pediatrics group spending more time than the cardiology and oncology groups. The total cost of the process was nearly dollar 166 000 annually. The average cost per review was dollar 11, the average cost per patient-day denied was dollar 478, and the average cost per patient denial was dollar 1592.ConclusionsThese figures are conservative in that they do not include the payer component of the costs, which could be as high as the hospital provider cost. Given a denial rate of < 2% and the high cost of the process, it may be beneficial to investigate alternative processes for conducting utilization review.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.