• Michael E Bowdish, Christina E Barkauskas, Jessica R Overbey, Robert L Gottlieb, Keren Osman, Abhijit Duggal, Mary E Marks, Jonathan Hupf, Eustace Fernandes, Bradley G Leshnower, Jonathan L Golob, Alexander Iribarne, Athos J Rassias, Ellen G Moquete, Karen O'Sullivan, Helena L Chang, Judson B Williams, Sam Parnia, Nirav C Patel, Nimesh D Desai, Andrew M Vekstein, Beth A Hollister, Tammie Possemato, Christian Romero, Peter C Hou, Elizabeth Burke, Jack Hayes, Fred Grossman, Silviu Itescu, Marc Gillinov, Francis D Pagani, Patrick T O'Gara, Michael J Mack, Peter K Smith, Emilia Bagiella, Alan J Moskowitz, and Annetine C Gelijns.
• Department of Surgery and Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2023 Feb 1; 207 (3): 261270261-270.

AbstractRationale: There are limited therapeutic options for patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome with inflammation-mediated lung injury. Mesenchymal stromal cells offer promise as immunomodulatory agents. Objectives: Evaluation of efficacy and safety of allogeneic mesenchymal cells in mechanically-ventilated patients with moderate or severe COVID-19-induced respiratory failure. Methods: Patients were randomized to two infusions of 2 million cells/kg or sham infusions, in addition to the standard of care. We hypothesized that cell therapy would be superior to sham control for the primary endpoint of 30-day mortality. The key secondary endpoint was ventilator-free survival within 60 days, accounting for deaths and withdrawals in a ranked analysis. Measurements and Main Results: At the third interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring board recommended that the trial halt enrollment as the prespecified mortality reduction from 40% to 23% was unlikely to be achieved (n = 222 out of planned 300). Thirty-day mortality was 37.5% (42/112) in cell recipients versus 42.7% (47/110) in control patients (relative risk [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.21; P = 0.43). There were no significant differences in days alive off ventilation within 60 days (median rank, 117.3 [interquartile range, 60.0-169.5] in cell patients and 102.0 [interquartile range, 54.0-162.5] in control subjects; higher is better). Resolution or improvement of acute respiratory distress syndrome at 30 days was observed in 51/104 (49.0%) cell recipients and 46/106 (43.4%) control patients (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-3.21). There were no infusion-related toxicities and overall serious adverse events over 30 days were similar. Conclusions: Mesenchymal cells, while safe, did not improve 30-day survival or 60-day ventilator-free days in patients with moderate and/or severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome.

14 keywords...

hide…