• Journal of critical care · Dec 2022

    Review Meta Analysis

    Higher versus lower oxygenation strategies in the general intensive care unit population: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.

    • Lea Imeen van der Wal, Chloe C A Grim, David J van Westerloo, Marcus J Schultz, Evert de Jonge, and HelmerhorstHendrik J FHJFDepartment of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands..
    • Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: l.i.van_der_wal@lumc.nl.
    • J Crit Care. 2022 Dec 1; 72: 154151154151.

    PurposeOxygen therapy is vital in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but it is indistinct whether higher or lower oxygen targets are favorable. Our aim was to update the findings of randomized controlled trials (RTCs) comparing higher and lower oxygen strategies.Materials And MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched. RCTs comparing higher (liberal, hyperoxia) and lower (conservative, normoxia) oxygen in adult mechanically ventilated ICU patients were included. The main outcome was 90-day mortality; other outcomes include serious adverse events (SAE), support free days and length of stay (LOS).ResultsNo significant difference was observed for 90-day mortality. A lower incidence was found for SAEs, favoring lower oxygenation (OR, 0.86; 95%CI, 0.77-0.96; I 2 13%). No differences were observed in either support free days at day 28 or ICU and hospital LOS.ConclusionsNo difference was found for 90-day mortality, support free days and ICU and hospital LOS. However, a lower incidence of SAEs was found for lower oxygenation. These findings may have clinical implications for practice guidelines, yet it remains of paramount importance to continue conducting clinical trials, comparing groups with a clinically relevant contrast and focusing on the impact of important side effects.Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…