• Alex Sorkin, Avishai M Tsur, Roy Nadler, Ariel Hirschhorn, Ezri Tarazi, Jacob Chen, Noam Fink, Guy Avital, Shaul Gelikas, and Avi Benov.
• Trauma and Combat Medicine Branch, Surgeon General's Headquarters, Israel Defense Forces, Ramat Gan, Israel.
• Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 Sep 1; 24 (9): 602-605.

BackgroundThe Israeli Defense Forces-Medical Corps (IDF-MC) focuses on reducing preventable death by improving prehospital trauma care. High quality documentation of care can serve casualty care and to improve future care. Currently, paper casualty cards are used for documentation. Incomplete data acquisition and inadequate data handover are common. To resolve these deficits, the IDF-MC launched the BladeShield 101 project.ObjectivesTo assess the quality of casualty care data acquired by comparing standard paper casualty cards with the BladeShield 101.MethodsThe BladeShield 101 system consists of three components: a patient unit that records vital signs and medical care provided, a medical sensor that transmits to the patient unit, and a ruggedized mobile device that allows providers to access and document information. We compared all trauma registries of casualties treated between September 2019 and June 2020.ResultsThe system was applied during the study period on 24 patients. All data were transferred to the military trauma registry within one day, compared to 72% (141/194) with a paper casualty card (P < 0.01). Information regarding treatment time was available in 100% vs. 43% (P < 0.01) of cases and 98% vs. 67% (P < 0.01) of treatments provided were documented comparing BladeShield 101 with paper cards, respectively.ConclusionsUsing an autonomous system to record, view, deliver, and store casualty information may resolve most current information flow deficits. This solution will ultimately significantly improve individual patient care and systematic learning and development processes.

9 keywords...

hide…