• Kyuwon Lee, Brian Ellison, Magdy Selim, Ngo H Long, Aristotelis Filippidis, Ajith J Thomas, Pascal Spincemaille, Yi Wang, and Salil Soman.
• Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
• J Neuroimaging. 2023 Jan 1; 33 (1): 138146138-146.

Background And PurposeCerebral microbleed (CMB) detection impacts disease diagnosis and management. Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) MRI depictions of CMBs are used with phase images (SWIP) to distinguish blood from calcification, via qualitative intensity evaluation (bright/dark). However, the intensities depicted for a single lesion can vary within and across consecutive SWIP image planes, impairing the classification of findings as a CMB. We hypothesize that quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) MRI, which maps tissue susceptibility, demonstrates less in- and through-plane intensity variation, improving the clinician's ability to categorize a finding as a CMB.MethodsForty-eight patients with acute intracranial hemorrhage who received multi-echo gradient echo MRI used to generate both SWI/SWIP and morphology-enabled dipole inversion QSM images were enrolled. Five hundred and sixty lesions were visually classified as having homogeneous or heterogeneous in-plane and through-plane intensity by a neuroradiologist and two diagnostic radiology residents using published rating criteria. When available, brain CT scans were analyzed for calcification or acute hemorrhage. Relative risk (RR) ratios and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a generalized linear model with log link and binary error.ResultsQSM showed unambiguous lesion signal intensity three times more frequently than SWIP (RR = 0.3235, 95% CI 0.2386-0.4386, p<.0001). The probability of QSM depicting homogeneous lesion intensity was three times greater than SWIP for small (RR = 0.3172, 95% CI 0.2382-0.4225, p<.0001), large (RR = 0.3431, 95% CI 0.2045-0.5758, p<.0001), lobar (RR = 0.3215, 95% CI 0.2151-0.4805, p<.0001), cerebellar (RR = 0.3215, 95% CI 0.2151-0.4805, p<.0001), brainstem (RR = 0.3100, 95% CI 0.1192-0.8061, p = .0163), and basal ganglia (RR = 0.3380, 95% CI 0.1980-0.5769, p<.0001) lesions.ConclusionsQSM more consistently demonstrates interpretable lesion intensity compared to SWIP as used for distinguishing CMBs from calcification.© 2022 American Society of Neuroimaging.

14 keywords...

hide…