• Antonio Benedetto Cecere, Annalisa De Cicco, Gaetano Bruno, Giuseppe Toro, Giacomo Errico, Adriano Braile, and Alfredo Schiavone Panni.
• Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. De Crecchio 4, 80138, Naples, Italy.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov 1; 142 (11): 3265-3270.

IntroductionThe treatment of intracapsular femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in the elderly is usually based on hip replacement, both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). Recently, several tissue-sparing approaches for hip arthroplasty had been described with promising results in terms of hospitalization length, blood loss and dislocation rate. The aim of the present study was to compare the blood loss and the transfusion rate in a cohort of patients with FNF treated using an HA through both the SuperPath (SP) and the traditional posterolateral (PL) approaches.Materials And MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from patients affected by FNFs between January 2018 and February 2020. All patients with intracapsular FNF treated with a single HA implant (Profemur L, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., USA) via PL or SP approaches were included. Exclusion criteria were pathological fractures, polytrauma and preoperatively transfused patients.ResultsThirty-five patients were included and analysed in the present study. 17 patients were classified in the SP group, and 18 in the PL one. The rate of antithrombotic therapy was higher in the SP group compared with the PL group [10 (58, 82%) vs 4 (22, 2%)]. While the two groups did not differ in terms of preoperative haemoglobin (Hb), 48 h postoperative Hb and Hb reduction, a significative difference was observed in terms of blood transfusion rate (1 SP vs 9 PL, p = 0.0072).ConclusionsThe SuperPath approach in patients with FNF under antithrombotic therapy assures lower transfusion rate, potentially reducing complication rates and improving patients' outcomes.© 2021. The Author(s).

19 keywords...

hide…