• Mustafa Hariri, Georg Hauer, Maria Smolle, Patrick Sadoghi, Andreas Leithner, Benjamin Panzram, Christian Merle, Tobias Renkawitz, and Tilman Walker.
• Clinic for Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun 1; 143 (6): 338333893383-3389.

IntroductionThe aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcome between patients following fixed-bearing (FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) for antero-medial knee osteoarthrosis (OA) at two independent orthopedic centers.Materials And MethodsMatched-pairs were built between 35 patients receiving FB-UKR and 52 patients following MB-UKR regarding age at time of surgery, body mass index (BMI) and range of motion (ROM) preoperatively. Clinical and functional outcome was measured postoperatively by the American Knee Society Score (AKSS-O/AKSS-F), ROM, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) as well as the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36).ResultsThe average treatment effect of the treated (ATT) after propensity score matching showed a significantly superior ROM in patients following MB-UKR (FB: 118°, MB: 124°). All remaining parameters had no statistically significant differences between both groups involving TAS, AKSS and SF-36.ConclusionsThe present study suggests that MB-UKR can provide a greater ROM compared to FB-UKR on comparable patients. The authors believe that both designs are suitable for adequate improvement of clinical outcome and ROM for patients suffering from antero-medial osteoarthrosis of the knee joint.Level Of EvidenceRetrospective cohort study, Level IV.© 2022. The Author(s).

18 keywords...

hide…