• Gianluca Cappelleri, Giorgio Aldegheri, Francesco Ruggieri, Daniela Mamo, Guido Fanelli, and Andrea Casati.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy.
• Can J Anaesth. 2007 Apr 1;54(4):283-9.

BackgroundWe tested the hypothesis that using a subgluteus approach to the sciatic nerve requires a lower concentration of mepivacaine to obtain complete anesthesia as compared with the popliteal approach.MethodsWith midazolam premedication (0.05 mg kg(-1) iv), 48 patients undergoing hallux valgus repair were randomly allocated to receive a sciatic nerve block using either a posterior popliteal (group Popliteal, n = 24) or subgluteus (group Subgluteus, n = 24) approach with 30 mL of local anesthetic injected after elicitation of plantar flexion of the foot with a current ResultsThe minimum effective anesthetic concentration of mepivacaine resulting in complete block of the sciatic nerve in 50% of cases (ED(50)) was 0.95% +/- 0.014% (95% confidence intervals [CI(95)]: 0.77%-1.12%) in group Subgluteus and 1.53% +/- 0.453% (CI(95): 0.96%-2.00%) in group Popliteal (P = 0.026). The ED(95) for adequate nerve block calculated with probit transformation and logistic regression analysis was 1.12% (CI(95): 0.71%-1.99%) in group Subgluteus and 1.98% (CI(95): 1.39%-2.31%) in group Popliteal.ConclusionA subgluteus approach to the sciatic nerve facilitates a reduction of the minimum effective concentration of local anesthetic required to produce an effective surgical block within 30 min after the injection as compared with the posterior popliteal approach.

24 keywords...

hide…