• Mohammed Banat, Martin Vychopen, Johannes Wach, Abdallah Salemdawod, Jasmin Scorzin, and Hartmut Vatter.
• Department of Neurosurgery, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Building 81, 53127, Bonn, Germany. Mohammed.Banat@ukbonn.de.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct 1; 48 (5): 3505-3511.

PurposeTraumatic cranio-cervical instability in childhood is rare and constitutes a challenge for the treating surgeon. The aim of therapy is to restore cervical stability without limiting the range of motion. The goal of this systematic review was to find out whether, over the last 10 years, halo fixation (HF) could still be considered a successful treatment option without major risks or complications.MethodsWe analyzed studies describing the use of HF in traumatic injuries of the cranio-cervical junction in children under the age of 17. Searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases for the years from 2010 to 2020. The general success rate, the success rate related to underlying pathologies, and complication rates were evaluated.ResultsThe main indications for HF range from pre-surgical correction to postoperative fusion support. C2 is the most frequently injured vertebra in children. The overall success rate of HF was very high. Evaluation according to the underlying pathology showed that, except for atlanto-occipital dislocation, HF generates high fusion rates among different patient cohorts, mainly in C2 vertebra injuries and atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation. Only minor complications were reported, such as pin infections.ConclusionThe current data show that, when used according to the appropriate indication, HF is an effective conservative treatment option for cranio-cervical instability, associated with only minor complications.© 2021. The Author(s).

16 keywords...

hide…