• J Gen Intern Med · Jan 2023

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Home Blood Pressure Self-monitoring plus Self-titration of Antihypertensive Medication for Poorly Controlled Hypertension in Primary Care: the ADAMPA Randomized Clinical Trial.

    • Patricia Martínez-Ibáñez, Irene Marco-Moreno, Salvador Peiró, Lucia Martínez-Ibáñez, Ignacio Barreira-Franch, Laura Bellot-Pujalte, Eugenia Avelino-Hidalgo, Marina Escrig-Veses, María Bóveda-García, Mercedes Calleja-Del-Ser, Andreu Ferrero-Gregori, Adina A Iftimi, Isabel Hurtado, Aníbal García-Sempere, Clara L Rodríguez-Bernal, Margarita Giménez-Loreiro, Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno, José Sanfélix-Genovés, and ADAMPA research group.
    • INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jan 1; 38 (1): 818981-89.

    BackgroundPatient empowerment through pharmacological self-management is a common strategy in some chronic diseases such as diabetes, but it is rarely used for controlling blood pressure.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess self-monitoring plus self-titration of antihypertensive medication versus usual care for reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 12 months in poorly controlled hypertensive patients.DesignThe ADAMPA study was a pragmatic, controlled, randomized, non-masked clinical trial with two parallel arms in Valencia, Spain.ParticipantsHypertensive patients older than 40 years, with SBP over 145 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) over 90 mmHg, were recruited from July 2017 to June 2018.InterventionParticipants were randomized 1:1 to usual care versus an individualized, pre-arranged plan based on self-monitoring plus self-titration.Main MeasureThe primary outcome was the adjusted mean difference (AMD) in SBP between groups at 12 months.Key ResultsPrimary outcome data were available for 312 patients (intervention n=156, control n=156) of the 366 who were initially recruited. The AMD in SBP at 12 months (main analysis) was -2.9 mmHg (95% CI, -5.9 to 0.1, p=0.061), while the AMD in DBP was -1.9 mmHg (95% CI, -3.7 to 0.0, p=0.052). The results of the subgroup analysis were consistent with these for the main outcome measures. More patients in the intervention group achieved good blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg) at 12 months than in the control group (55.8% vs 42.3%, difference 13.5%, 95% CI, 2.5 to 24.5%, p=0.017). At 12 months, no differences were observed in behavior, quality of life, use of health services, or adverse events.ConclusionSelf-monitoring plus self-titration of antihypertensive medication based on an individualized pre-arranged plan used in primary care may be a promising strategy for reducing blood pressure at 12 months compared to usual care, without increasing healthcare utilization or adverse events.Trial RegistrationEudraCT, number 2016-003986-25 (registered 17 March 2017) and clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03242785.© 2022. The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.