• J R Soc Med · Nov 2006

    Multicenter Study

    Association of age, sex and deprivation with quality indicators for diabetes: population-based cross sectional survey in primary care.

    • Jeremy Gray, Christopher Millett, Caoimhe O'Sullivan, Rumana Z Omar, and Azeem Majeed.
    • Wandsworth Primary Care Research Centre, London SW11 6HN.
    • J R Soc Med. 2006 Nov 1; 99 (11): 576-81.

    ObjectivesTo determine the quality of diabetes management in primary care after the publication of the National Service Framework and examine the impact of age, gender and deprivation on the achievement of established quality indicators.DesignPopulation-based cross sectional survey using electronic general practice records carried out between June-October 2003.SettingThirty-four practices in Wandsworth, South-West London, UK.Participants6035 adult patients (> or =18 years) with diabetes from a total registered population of 201,572 patients.InterventionsNone.Main Outcome MeasuresSuccess rates for the diabetes quality indicators within the General Medical Services contract for general practitioners.ResultsWe identified large variations in diabetes management between general practitioner practices with poorer recording of quality care in younger patients (18-44 years). In addition, younger patients had a worse cholesterol and glycaemia profile, although hypertension was more common in older patients. Gender and deprivation did not appear to be important determinants of the quality of care received.ConclusionsThere are large variations in diabetes management between general practitioner practices, with care seemingly worse for younger adults. Longitudinal studies are required to determine whether current UK quality improvement initiatives have been successful in attenuating existing variations in care and treatment outcomes.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.