• Ann. Intern. Med. · Nov 2022

    Meta Analysis

    15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality : A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials.

    • Frederik E Juul, Amanda J Cross, Robert E Schoen, Carlo Senore, Paul Pinsky, Eric Miller, Nereo Segnan, Kate Wooldrage, Paulina Wieszczy-Szczepanik, Paola Armaroli, Kjetil K Garborg, Hans-Olov Adami, Geir Hoff, Mette Kalager, Michael Bretthauer, Magnus Løberg, and Øyvind Holme.
    • Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.).
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2022 Nov 1; 175 (11): 152515331525-1533.

    BackgroundThe effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) by sex and age in randomized trials is uncertain.ObjectiveTo evaluate the 15-year effect of sigmoidoscopy screening on CRC incidence and mortality.DesignPooled analysis of 4 large-scale randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening.SettingNorway, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy.ParticipantsWomen and men aged 55 to 64 years at enrollment.InterventionSigmoidoscopy screening.MeasurementsPrimary end points were cumulative incidence rate ratio (IRR) and mortality rate ratio (MRR) and rate differences after 15 years of follow-up comparing screening versus usual care in intention-to-treat analyses. Stratified analyses were done by sex, cancer site, and age at screening.ResultsAnalyses comprised 274 952 persons (50.7% women), 137 493 in the screening and 137 459 in the usual care group. Screening attendance was 58% to 84%. After 15 years, the rate difference for CRC incidence was 0.51 cases (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63 cases) per 100 persons and the IRR was 0.79 (CI, 0.75 to 0.83). The rate difference for CRC mortality was 0.13 deaths (CI, 0.07 to 0.19 deaths) per 100 persons, and the MRR was 0.80 (CI, 0.72 to 0.88). Women had less benefit from screening than men for CRC incidence (IRR for women, 0.84 [CI, 0.77 to 0.91]; IRR for men, 0.75 [CI, 0.70 to 0.81]; P = 0.032 for difference) and mortality (MRR for women, 0.91 [CI, 0.77 to 1.17]; MRR for men, 0.73 [CI, 0.64 to 0.83]; P = 0.025 for difference). There was no statistically significant difference in screening effect between persons aged 55 to 59 years and those aged 60 to 64 years.LimitationData from the U.K. trial were less granular because of privacy regulations.ConclusionThis pooled analysis of all large randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening demonstrates a significant and sustained effect of sigmoidoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality for 15 years.Primary Funding SourceHealth Fund of South-East Norway.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.