• Wengen Zhu, Zexuan Wu, Yugang Dong, LipGregory Y HGYHLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. gregory.lip@liverpool.ac.uk.Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg Universi, and Chen Liu.
• Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. zhuwg6@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
• Bmc Med. 2022 Oct 13; 20 (1): 340.

BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend rhythm control for improving symptoms and quality of life in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the long-term prognostic outcomes of rhythm control compared with rate control are still inconclusive. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effects of early rhythm control compared with rate control on clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed AF patients.MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases up to August 2022 for randomized and observational studies reporting the associations of early rhythm control (defined as within 12 months of AF diagnosis) with effectiveness outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, admission to hospital for heart failure (HF), or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study were pooled using a random-effects model, complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model.ResultsA total of 8 studies involving 447,202 AF patients were included, and 23.5% of participants underwent an early rhythm-control therapy. In the pooled analysis using the random-effects model, compared with rate control, the early rhythm-control strategy was significantly associated with reductions in the primary composite outcome (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86-0.89) and secondary outcomes, including stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.85), ischemic stroke (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.94), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.99), HF hospitalization (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.92), and ACS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.98). Reanalyses using the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model yielded similar results.ConclusionsOur current meta-analysis suggested that early initiation of rhythm control treatment was associated with improved adverse effectiveness outcomes in patients who had been diagnosed with AF within 1 year.RegistrationThe study protocol was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42021295405).© 2022. The Author(s).

11 keywords...

hide…