-
Journal of neurosurgery · Jun 2023
Surgical instruments and catheter damage during ventriculoperitoneal shunt assembly.
- FisherWilson A MWAM, Michael P Catalino, E Alice Woolard, Bethany J Andrews, Scott Elton, and Carolyn Quinsey.
- J. Neurosurg. 2023 Jun 1; 138 (6): 174017471740-1747.
ObjectiveCurrent surgical techniques use common surgical instruments for sterile shunt assembly. This study investigated the impact of using these techniques and surgical instruments on the mechanical integrity of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt system, specifically shunt catheters.MethodsThe authors conducted failure testing on 85 rifampin-coated catheters and 85 barium-impregnated catheters using 5 different surgical instruments and 2 different surgical techniques. In technique A, the distal end of the catheter was pushed onto the shunt valve inlet connector with the surgical instrument. In technique B, the catheter was pulled over the inlet connector. One hundred sixty catheters underwent 10-repetition-maximum testing, in which the catheter either failed before completion of 10 consecutive assembly/disassembly repetitions or the catheter completed 10 consecutive repetitions. The authors also conducted 100-repetition-maximum tests on 5 barium-impregnated and 5 rifampin-coated catheters using technique A.ResultsCatheter failure rates were significantly different among the different instruments used in assembly (p ≤ 0.001). Post hoc analysis showed that using mosquito forceps with shods resulted in a significantly lower catheter failure rate than the other instruments (p < 0.0005). The catheter failure rate of technique A was significantly lower than that of technique B (5% vs 81%, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the failure rates of the barium and rifampin catheters (42% vs 44%, p = 0.9), but the barium catheters outperformed the rifampin catheters in the 100-repetition-maximum trials (p = 0.02). Instrument type (p = 0.0232) and catheter type (p = 0.0096) were both significant factors in determining the number of assembly/disassembly repetitions needed to cause catheter failure. It took an average of 2.79 repetitions of assembly/disassembly to cause catheter failure. DeBakey forceps had significantly lower mean repetitions to failure (mean 1.38) than the Gerald forceps without teeth (mean 2.73, p = 0.05) and bayonet (mean 3.25, p = 0.02).ConclusionsThis study was the first of its kind to analyze how physical manipulation affects the mechanical integrity of ventriculoperitoneal shunt components. The authors demonstrated a significantly lower shunt catheter failure rate when mosquito forceps with shods and technique A were used in assembly. Moreover, the authors established that use of DeBakey forceps resulted in failure with fewer assembly/disassembly repetitions than use of the Gerald and bayonet forceps, suggesting that DeBakey forceps are the most damaging instrument.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.