• Thomas Ludden, Lindsay Shade, Jeremy Thomas, Mark W Russo, Michael Leonard, Philippe J Zamor, Charity G Patterson, and Hazel Tapp.
• From Department of Family Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (TL, LS, JT, HT); Department of Hepatology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (MWR, PJZ); Department of Infectious Diseases, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (ML); School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (CGP). tom.ludden@atriumhealth.org.
• J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Oct 18; 35 (5): 990-997.

IntroductionIncreased screening efforts and the development of effective antiviral treatments have led to marked improvement in Hepatitis C (HCV) patient outcomes. However, many people in the US are believed to have undiagnosed HCV. Successful screening strategies and access to a coordinated system of care are critical for HCV affected adults. The objective of this study was to evaluate a primary care HCV screening education intervention that took place 2018 to 2019 to improve primary care training and management of patients after the implementation of the electronic medical record (EMR) screening alert.MethodsUsing 15 primary care practices located in vicinity of neighborhoods at-risk for higher rates of HCV infections, a stepped wedge randomized control study design was utilized to deliver an educational screening intervention. The education intervention was implemented sequentially with 5 practices being presented to every 3 months. Number of patients within the Baby Boomer cohort (birth years 1945-1965) were collected 3 months before the first practice receiving the intervention to 3 months after the last practice receiving the education intervention. The main outcome collected was the HCV screening. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test the hypothesis of improved screening rates after intervention implementation.ResultsThere were a total of 85,697 patients within the Baby Boomer cohort seen at the 15 practices. Practices receiving the intervention had patients who were more likely to be screened for HCV (β = 0.259, P < .001; Odds Ratio [OR] [95%CI] 1.296 [1.098-1.529]).In terms of demographics, results showed that females are less likely to be screened than males (β = -0.141, P < .001; OR [95%CI] 0.868[0.813 to 0.927]), Baby Boomer patients aged less than 65 were more likely to be screened than Baby Boomer patients aged 65 and older (β = 0.293, P < .001; OR [95%CI] 1.340[1.251 to 1.436]).DiscussionThis study looked at screening rates before and after an educational intervention which happened subsequent to the activation of an EMR alert. Whereas HCV EMR alerts showed an increase in HCV screenings before the education intervention, the addition of the education showed a modest increase in HCV screening rates for Baby Boomer patients.© Copyright by the American Board of Family Medicine.

17 keywords...

hide…