• Neurosurgery · Dec 2022

    Development of Risk Stratification Predictive Models for Cervical Deformity Surgery.

    • Peter G Passias, Waleed Ahmad, Cheongeun Oh, Bailey Imbo, Sara Naessig, Katherine Pierce, Virginie Lafage, Renaud Lafage, D Kojo Hamilton, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Eric O Klineberg, Jeffrey Gum, Andrew J Schoenfeld, Breton Line, Robert A Hart, Douglas C Burton, Shay Bess, Frank J Schwab, Justin S Smith, Christopher I Shaffrey, Christopher P Ames, and International Spine Study Group.
    • Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA.
    • Neurosurgery. 2022 Dec 1; 91 (6): 928935928-935.

    BackgroundAs corrective surgery for cervical deformity (CD) increases, so does the rate of complications and reoperations. To minimize suboptimal postoperative outcomes, it is important to develop a tool that allows for proper preoperative risk stratification.ObjectiveTo develop a prognostic utility for identification of risk factors that lead to the development of major complications and unplanned reoperations.MethodsCD patients age 18 years or older were stratified into 2 groups based on the postoperative occurrence of a revision and/or major complication. Multivariable logistic regressions identified characteristics that were associated with revision or major complication. Decision tree analysis established cutoffs for predictive variables. Models predicting both outcomes were quantified using area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating curve characteristics.ResultsA total of 109 patients with CD were included in this study. By 1 year postoperatively, 26 patients experienced a major complication and 17 patients underwent a revision. Predictive modeling incorporating preoperative and surgical factors identified development of a revision to include upper instrumented vertebrae > C5, lowermost instrumented vertebrae > T7, number of unfused lordotic cervical vertebrae > 1, baseline T1 slope > 25.3°, and number of vertebral levels in maximal kyphosis > 12 (AUC: 0.82). For developing a major complication, a model included a current smoking history, osteoporosis, upper instrumented vertebrae inclination angle < 0° or > 40°, anterior diskectomies > 3, and a posterior Smith Peterson osteotomy (AUC: 0.81).ConclusionRevisions were predicted using a predominance of radiographic parameters while the occurrence of major complications relied on baseline bone health, radiographic, and surgical characteristics.Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.