• J H Wasson, A M Jette, J Anderson, D J Johnson, E C Nelson, and C M Kilo.
• Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Information and Research Network, Department of Community & Family Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-3862, USA. john.h.wasson@dartmouth... more .edu less
• J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov 1; 49 (11): 1017-22.

BackgroundAbusive relationships are associated with several demographic factors and many clinical problems in women. However, practices often do not screen for abuse.MethodsThis is a descriptive study of 1526 women aged 19 to 69 years who completed a health survey in 31 office practices. The 53-item survey included a question designed to screen for an abusive relationship. Our analysis compared self-reported measures of symptoms (N = 13) and functional limitations (n = 6) of women who had abusive relationships with those who did not. We also examined the utility of using a constellation of clinical problems to identify risk for abuse.ResultsWomen in abusive relationships were more likely to be poor (37% vs 14%; P < .001) and young (87% were younger than 51 years versus 69% of those who were not in such relationships; P < .001). They had twice as many bothersome symptoms (3.1 vs 1.7; P < .001) and functional problems (1.6 vs 0.8; P < .001). Approximately 40% (36/89) of low-income women with emotional problems were at risk for abuse versus only 6% (64/1025) of women with adequate financial resources and no emotional problems. However, because so many women were at low risk, almost twice as many in this group (n = 64) reported abusive relationships than in the high-risk group (n = 36).ConclusionsWomen in abusive relationships have many symptoms and functional limitations. However, symptoms and clinical problems provide insufficient clues for abuse. It is better just to ask. A single-item screening question appears adequate for this purpose.

14 keywords...

hide…