• A G Syrkina and V V Ryabov.
• Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Centre.
• Terapevt Arkh. 2021 Apr 15; 93 (4): 502-508.

AbstractCardiogenic shock is the pathology most commonly encountered by intensive care physicians. Its frequency averages 410% in STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) patients and 24% in NONSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) patients. Effective shock therapy is impossible without understanding the hemodynamic mechanisms of its occurrence. Many authors emphasize that cardiac output is the most important indicator of cardiac function, which necessitates its monitoring. Meanwhile, the cardiac output monitoring is associated with a number of difficulties, including those related to the technology of recording this function. In this article, the authors emphasize the importance of measuring central hemodynamic parameters in patients with predominantly cardiogenic shock. We have tried to structure the knowledge about different techniques of central hemodynamics monitoring, considered advantages and disadvantages of each of them. We believe that the data obtained by hemodynamic monitoring should be closely studied and used, because sometimes multidirectional mechanisms may be involved in the genesis of shock; therefore, therapy should be based on the data obtained in a particular patient.

3 keywords...

hide…