• Guofu Zhong, Yue Han, Qinghua Zhu, Mujuan Xu, Xiao Chang, Mingtai Chen, Ling Men, Qiang Zhang, and Ling Wang.
• Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 21; 101 (42): e31196e31196.

BackgroundXuebijing injection (XBJ) has increasingly been used for sepsis in China. We aimed to evaluate the methodological quality and summarize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of XBJ combined with ulinastatin (UTI) for sepsis from systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs).MethodsFrom the inception to May 23, 2021, eight databases were searched to screen the SRs/MAs of XBJ combined with UTI in the treatment of sepsis. Methodology Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the methods. Grading of Recommendation,Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used in the assessment of evidence quality.ResultsSeven SRs/MAs on XBJ combined with UTI treatment for sepsis were included. The AMSTAR-2 showed that the methodological quality of all included SRs/MAs was rated as critically low. According to the evaluation results of GRADE, 30% (13/44), 30% (13/44), and 40% (18/44) were rated to be of moderate, low, and critically low quality, respectively. Descriptive analysis results showed that XBJ combined with UTI was an effective treatment modality for sepsis.ConclusionsAll included SRs/MAs showed that XBJ combined with UTI was more effective than UTI alone in the treatment of sepsis on the basis of conventional treatment, but the reliability of the results was limited due to the disadvantages of lower methodological quality and higher risk of bias in the included SRs/MAs. Further high-quality clinical studies and SRs/MAs are recommended to verify whether XBJ combined with UTI is more effective than UTI alone.Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

7 keywords...

hide…