• Charith Ratnayake, David O Okonkwo, and Barton F Branstetter.
• University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2023 Jan 1; 169: e230e234e230-e234.

BackgroundAmong stroke patients, primary intracerebral hemorrhage has the highest mortality rate. Expansion of hematoma plays a prognostic role in these patients. Although fluid levels have been shown to predict subsequent hematoma expansion, there are mimics of fluid levels that may confuse interpretation. We hypothesized that patients with true fluid levels on head computed tomography (CT) have higher hematoma progression rates and worse outcomes compared with patients who have fluid level mimics on CT.MethodsAdult patients presenting with intracerebral hemorrhage described as a fluid level on initial CT interpretation were included. Medical records were reviewed to extract relevant clinical variables. A CAQ-certified neuroradiologist retrospectively determined whether there was a true fluid level or mimic on CT and then evaluated follow-up CT scans for radiologic progression. We compared radiologic progression, mortality, and anticoagulation status between patients with true fluid levels and fluid level mimics.ResultsThe study included 12 patients, 8 with true fluid levels and 4 with radiologic mimics. The patients with true fluid levels had a significantly higher likelihood of radiographic progression (P = 0.014). Differences in outcome, use of anticoagulation therapy, and average international normalized ratio were not significant.ConclusionsA fluid level within intraparenchymal hemorrhage on head CT scan is associated with higher likelihood of intracerebral hemorrhage progression. However, this applies only to true fluid levels, with mimics having a lower likelihood of progression. A careful analysis of potential fluid levels is necessary before assigning prognostic implications.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…