• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Jun 2014

    Comparative Study

    Ability to discriminate between healthy and low back pain sufferers using ultrasound during maximum lumbar extension.

    • Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas and Manuel González-Sánchez.
    • IBIMA, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Andalucia Tech, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain; School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: acuesta@uma.es.
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jun 1;95(6):1093-9.

    ObjectiveTo analyze the ability to discriminate between healthy individuals and individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) by measuring the relation between patient-reported outcomes and objective clinical outcome measures of the erector spinae (ES) muscles using an ultrasound during maximal isometric lumbar extension.DesignCross-sectional study with screening and diagnostic tests with no blinded comparison.SettingUniversity laboratory.ParticipantsHealthy individuals (n=33) and individuals with CNLBP (n=33).InterventionsEach subject performed an isometric lumbar extension. With the variables measured, a discriminate analysis was performed using a value ≥ 6 in the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ) as the grouping variable. Then, a logistic regression with the functional and architectural variables was performed. A new index was obtained from each subject value input in the discriminate multivariate analysis.Main Outcome MeasuresMorphologic muscle variables of the ES muscle were measured through ultrasound images. The reliability of the measures was calculated through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The relation between patient-reported outcomes and objective clinical outcome measures was analyzed using a discriminate function from standardized values of the variables and an analysis of the reliability of the ultrasound measurement.ResultsThe reliability tests show an ICC value >.95 for morphologic and functional variables. The independent variables included in the analysis explained 42% (P=.003) of the dependent variable variance.ConclusionsThe relation between objective variables (electromyography, thickness, pennation angle) and a subjective variable (RMDQ ≥ 6) and the capacity of this relation to identify CNLBP within a group of healthy subjects is moderate. These results should be considered by clinicians when treating this type of patient in clinical practice.Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.