• Jennifer Y C Edgoose, Diana N Carvajal, Kristin M P Reavis, Lashika Yogendran, Angela T Echiverri, and José E Rodriguez.
• From Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (JYCE); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (KR); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (LY); Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (ATE); Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JER). jennifer.edgoose@fammed.wisc.edu.
• J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Dec 23; 35 (6): 123912451239-1245.

AbstractOver the past several years, in both clinical and academic medicine, there seems to be a growing consensus that racial/ethnic health inequities result from social, economic and political determinants of health rather than from nonexistent biological markers of race. Simply put, racism is the root cause of inequity, not race. Yet, methods of teaching and practicing medicine have not kept pace with this truth, and many learners and practitioners continue to extrapolate a biological underpinning for race. To achieve systemic change that moves us toward racially/ethnically equitable health outcomes, it is imperative that medical academia implement policies that explicitly hold us accountable to maintain a clear understanding of race as a socio-political construct so that we can conduct research, disseminate scholarly work, teach, and practice clinically with more clarity about race and racism. This short commentary proposes the use of a socioecological framework to help individuals, leadership teams, and institutions consider the implementation of various strategies for interpersonal, community-level, and broad institutional policy changes. This proposed model includes examples of how to address race and racism in academic medicine across different spheres, but also draws attention to the complex interplay across these levels. The model is not intended to be prescriptive, but rather encourages adaptation according to existing institutional differences. This model can be used as a tool to refresh how academic medicine addresses race and, more importantly, normalizes conversations about racism and equity across all framework levels.© Copyright by the American Board of Family Medicine.

9 keywords...

hide…