• Spine J · Sep 2015

    The radiologic, clinical results and digestive function improvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

    • Chao Liu, Guoquan Zheng, Yonggang Zhang, Xiangyu Tang, Kai Song, Jun Fu, Zheng Wang, Geng Cui, and Yan Wang.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (301 Hospital), 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing, 100853, PR China.
    • Spine J. 2015 Sep 1;15(9):1988-93.

    Background ContextAlthough there have been several reports describing the radiologic and clinical outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with spinal kyphotic deformity, little is known about the digestive function improvement in AS kyphosis after PSO.PurposeThe aim was to assess radiologic and clinical results and digestive function improvement in patients with AS kyphosis after PSO.Study Design/SettingThis was a retrospective clinical study.Patient SampleFrom January 2009 to July 2013, 53 patients in our department with AS kyphotic deformity who underwent PSO were reviewed.Outcome MeasuresThe globe kyphosis (GK) was measured. A health-related quality of life included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument-22 (SRS-22). The acreage of the abdominal median sagittal plane (AMSPA) and the minimum distance (MD) between the xiphoid process and the spine or between the abdominal wall and the spine when the abdominal wall was folded into abdomen were measured on the three-dimensional computed tomography scans. The positional changes of abdominal viscera, such as the liver, spleen, and kidney, were also measured. Digestive function assessment included weight and the food intake (FI), and the change of the defecate frequency was recorded.MethodsA paired sample t test was performed to determine the differences between the preoperative and postoperative MD, AMSPA, and weight, respectively. A paired sample t test was also performed to determine the differences between preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SRS-22 for all the patients, respectively. A paired sample t test was also performed to determine the positional changes of abdominal viscera. Description date was presented as mean±standard deviation. Additionally, an independent sample t test was performed to determine the differences between the patients (Group 1) who had defecate frequency change and the remaining patients (Group 2) for preoperative GK, age, and disease duration, respectively. An independent sample t test was also performed to determine the differences between the patients (Group A) who had obviously increased FI and the remaining patients (Group B) for preoperative GK, age, and disease duration, respectively.ResultsAll the patients had good radiologic and clinical results, postoperatively. The postoperative positions of the abdominal viscera were changed significantly. The weight, the mass of FI, and the defecate frequency were also changed significantly, postoperatively. The preoperative GK, age, and disease duration were not significantly statistical different between the patients who had defecate frequency change and the remaining patients, respectively. There were also not significantly statistical differences between the patients who had obviously increased FI and the remaining patients in preoperative age and disease duration. There was a significantly statistical difference between the patients who had obviously increased FI and the remaining patients for preoperative GK.ConclusionsThe single-level or two-level PSO is an effective and safe technique to correct AS kyphosis. And the conditions of extrusion of viscera by trunk flexion decreased volume of the abdominal cavity, and abnormal visceral positions were improved by the osteotomy, followed with digestive function improvement.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…