-
Meta Analysis
Association between gut microbiota and preeclampsia-eclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
- Pengsheng Li, Haiyan Wang, Lan Guo, Xiaoyan Gou, Gengdong Chen, Dongxin Lin, Dazhi Fan, Xiaoling Guo, and Zhengping Liu.
- Foshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, China.
- Bmc Med. 2022 Nov 15; 20 (1): 443443.
BackgroundSeveral recent observational studies have reported that gut microbiota composition is associated with preeclampsia. However, the causal effect of gut microbiota on preeclampsia-eclampsia is unknown.MethodsA two-sample Mendelian randomization study was performed using the summary statistics of gut microbiota from the largest available genome-wide association study meta-analysis (n=13,266) conducted by the MiBioGen consortium. The summary statistics of preeclampsia-eclampsia were obtained from the FinnGen consortium R7 release data (5731 cases and 160,670 controls). Inverse variance weighted, maximum likelihood, MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted model, MR-PRESSO, and cML-MA were used to examine the causal association between gut microbiota and preeclampsia-eclampsia. Reverse Mendelian randomization analysis was performed on the bacteria that were found to be causally associated with preeclampsia-eclampsia in forward Mendelian randomization analysis. Cochran's Q statistics were used to quantify the heterogeneity of instrumental variables.ResultsInverse variance weighted estimates suggested that Bifidobacterium had a protective effect on preeclampsia-eclampsia (odds ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.89, P = 8.03 × 10-4). In addition, Collinsella (odds ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.98, P = 0.03), Enterorhabdus (odds ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.93, P = 8.76 × 10-3), Eubacterium (ventriosum group) (odds ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.91, P = 2.43 × 10-3), Lachnospiraceae (NK4A136 group) (odds ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.92, P = 3.77 × 10-3), and Tyzzerella 3 (odds ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.97, P = 0.01) presented a suggestive association with preeclampsia-eclampsia. According to the results of reverse MR analysis, no significant causal effect of preeclampsia-eclampsia was found on gut microbiota. No significant heterogeneity of instrumental variables or horizontal pleiotropy was found.ConclusionsThis two-sample Mendelian randomization study found that Bifidobacterium was causally associated with preeclampsia-eclampsia. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the protective effect of probiotics on preeclampsia-eclampsia and their specific protective mechanisms.© 2022. The Author(s).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.