• Amir H Sam, Chee Yeen Fung, Malcolm Reed, Elizabeth Hughes, and Karim Meeran.
• Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK a.sam@imperial.ac.uk.
• Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Nov 1; 22 (6): 590593590-593.

AbstractSuccessful completion of year 1 of the UK Foundation Programme is a General Medical Council requirement that newly qualified doctors must achieve in order to gain full registration for licence to practise in the UK. We present compelling evidence that both sections of the UK Foundation Programme allocation process, consisting of the Educational Performance Measure and Situational Judgement Test scores, are not fit for purpose. The ranking process drives competitive behaviours among medical students and undermines NHS teamworking values. Furthermore, data from 2013-2020 show that UK minority ethnic students consistently receive significantly lower SJT scores than White students. The current process in the UK allocates lower ranked students, who often need more academic and social support, to undersubscribed regions. This can lead to vacancies in less popular regions, ultimately worsening health inequality. A preference-informed allocation process will improve trainee access to support and help retain trainees in underserved regions. We aim to summarise the flaws of the current system and report a potential radical solution.© Royal College of Physicians 2022. All rights reserved.

11 keywords...

hide…