• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Feb 2023

    Patient safety practices in European anaesthesiology: Expert evaluation and ranking.

    • Aimee McCreedy, Johannes Wacker, Robert Ffrench-O'Carroll, Kasper Gymoese Berthelsen, Kremeňova TatičováZuzanaZ, and Andrew F Smith.
    • From the Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK (AM, AFS), the Hirslanden Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland (JW), the Department of Anaesthesia, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (RFo'C), the Department of Anaesthesia, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark (KGM), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Košice, Slovakia (ZKT).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Feb 1; 40 (2): 113120113-120.

    BackgroundPatient safety is a key concern of anaesthesiology practice. However, good practices are often not widely shared between departments and hospitals, whether within or between countries.ObjectiveWe aimed to collect and analyse safety practices and tips from anaesthesiology departments around Europe in order to facilitate successful transfer of safety knowledge.DesignReview of previously collected safety practices; allocation of numerical scores in order to rank them on 0-5 scales in terms of anticipated impact, and speed, cost, and ease of implementation; free text comment on any possible difficulties or unintended harms which might arise from adopting any of the collected practices.SettingCollaborative remote working of expert group.ParticipantsNineteen experts in patient safety in anaesthesiology from nine European countries.Main Outcome MeasuresRankings of safety practices for anticipated practice impact, cost, speed, and ease of implementation.ResultsWe collected 117 practices. The highest-ranked items for potential beneficial impact were: standardising the layout of drug trolleys (4.82); involving all staff in new safety initiatives in the operating theatre (4.73); ensuring patients' medical records are available at the time of surgery (4.71); running regular simulation training sessions in departments of anaesthesia (4.67); and creating a difficult airway management trolley (4.65). A major theme to emerge from the qualitative analysis of the experts' free text comments was the risk that practices aimed at enhancing patient safety might not achieve the effect intended, as introducing new safety activities can cause more mistakes during the implementation phase.ConclusionMany useful practices to promote patient safety were identified, but as some practices appear to be context-dependent, we recommend that a proper, prospective risk assessment is carried out before they are introduced in a new setting. The full list of items is available online as Supplementary Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/EJA/A785 .Trial RegistrationNot applicable.Copyright © 2022 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.