-
Multicenter Study
Demystifying BRAF Mutation Status in Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multi-institutional, Collaborative Approach to 6 Open Clinical Questions.
- Georgios A Margonis, Thomas Boerner, Jean-Baptiste Bachet, Stefan Buettner, Roberto Moretto, Nikolaos Andreatos, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Jane Wang, Carsten Kamphues, Johan Gagniere, Sara Lonardi, Inger M Løes, Doris Wagner, Andrea Spallanzani, Kazunari Sasaki, Richard Burkhart, Filippo Pietrantonio, Emmanouil Pikoulis, Timothy M Pawlik, Stéphanie Truant, Armando Orlandi, Anastasia Pikouli, Nicoletta Pella, Katharina Beyer, George Poultsides, Hendrik Seeliger, Federico N Aucejo, Peter Kornprat, Klaus Kaczirek, Per E Lønning, Martin E Kreis, Christopher L Wolfgang, Matthew J Weiss, Chiara Cremolini, Stéphane Benoist, and Michael D'Angelica.
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
- Ann. Surg. 2023 Sep 1; 278 (3): e540e548e540-e548.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical implications of BRAF -mutated (mut BRAF ) colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs).BackgroundThe clinical implications of mut BRAF status in CRLMs are largely unknown.MethodsPatients undergoing resection for mut BRAF CRLM were identified from prospectively maintained registries of the collaborating institutions. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared among patients with V600E versus non-V600E mutations, KRAS/BRAF comutation versus mut BRAF alone, microsatellite stability status (Microsatellite Stable (MSS) vs instable (MSI-high)), upfront resectable versus converted tumors, extrahepatic versus liver-limited disease, and intrahepatic recurrence treated with repeat hepatectomy versus nonoperative management.ResultsA total of 240 patients harboring BRAF -mutated tumors were included. BRAF V600E mutation was associated with shorter OS (30.6 vs 144 mo, P =0.004), but not RFS compared with non-V600E mutations. KRAS/BRAF comutation did not affect outcomes. MSS tumors were associated with shorter RFS (9.1 vs 26 mo, P <0.001) but not OS (33.5 vs 41 mo, P =0.3) compared with MSI-high tumors, whereas patients with resected converted disease had slightly worse RFS (8 vs 11 mo, P =0.01) and similar OS (30 vs 40 mo, P =0.4) compared with those with upfront resectable disease. Patients with extrahepatic disease had worse OS compared with those with liver-limited disease (8.8 vs 40 mo, P <0.001). Repeat hepatectomy after intrahepatic recurrence was associated with improved OS compared with nonoperative management (41 vs 18.7 mo, P =0.004). All results continued to hold true in the multivariable OS analysis.ConclusionsAlthough surgery may be futile in patients with BRAF -mutated CRLM and concurrent extrahepatic disease, resection of converted disease resulted in encouraging survival in the absence of extrahepatic spread. Importantly, second hepatectomy in select patients with recurrence was associated with improved outcomes. Finally, MSI-high status identifies a better prognostic group, with regard to RFS while patients with non-V600E mutations have excellent prognosis.Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.