• Nikolaos K Kanakaris, Paul J Harwood, Ruben Mujica-Mota, Ganesh Mohrir, George Chloros, and Peter V Giannoudis.
• Leeds Major Trauma Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Clarendon Wing, Level D, Leeds, LS13EX, West Yorkshire, UK. nikolaoskanakaris@yahoo.co.uk.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr 1; 49 (2): 951964951-964.

PurposeThe cost implications of limb reconstruction techniques have not been adequately investigated. Aim of this pilot study was to compare the direct medical cost of tibial bone defects managed with distraction osteogenesis-Ilizarov method (ILF), or with Masquelet technique (MIF).MethodsData of 20 random patients treated in a single centre were analysed. Inclusion criteria included acute tibial defects, or post-debridement of nonunions with complete follow-up and successful union. The endpoint of clinical efficacy was the time-to-defect union. Comparisons were made between equally sized subgroups (ILF vs. MIF).ResultsThe average defect length was 5.6 cm (2.6-9.6 cm). The overall cost of 20 cases reached £452,974 (mean £22,339, range £13,459-£36,274). Statistically significant differences favoring the MIF were found regarding the average time-to-union; number of surgeries, of admissions and follow-up visits, as well as the mean intraoperative cost (£8857 vs. £14,087). These differences lead to significant differences of the mean cost of the overall treatment (MIF £18,131 vs. ILF £26,126). Power analysis based on these data indicated that 35 patients on each group would allow detection of a 25% difference, with an alpha value of 0.05 and probability (power) of 0.9.ConclusionsThe results and analysis presented highlight factors affecting the high financial burden, even in a best-case scenario, this type of surgery entails. Larger pivotal studies should follow to improve the cost efficiency of clinical practice.© 2022. Crown.

16 keywords...

hide…