• Sung-Min Rhee, Du-Han Kim, Yong Girl Rhee, and Chul-Hyun Cho.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug 1; 143 (8): 459746044597-4604.

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and complications after humeral head replacement (HHR) and total shoulder replacement (TSR) in patients with osteonecrosis of the humeral head (ONHH).Materials And MethodsTwenty-six patients who underwent shoulder replacement (13 HHRs and 13 TSRs) for nontraumatic ONHH were included. The mean follow-up period was 96.4 months. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and range of motion (ROM) at the final follow-up evaluation were used for the assessment of clinical outcomes.ResultsThe mean VAS pain score, UCLA score, and ASES score showed significant improvement from 6.3, 11.6, and 35.0 before surgery to 2.2, 28.9, and 82.6 at the final follow-up evaluation (all p < 0.001). No significant differences regarding all clinical scores and ROMs were observed between the HHR group and the TSR group, except that a greater abduction angle was observed in the HHR group compared with the TSR group (123.1° versus 96.9°, p = 0.014). Two patients in the TSR group underwent multiple reoperations due to periprosthetic joint infection. No revision surgeries were performed for glenoid erosion following HHR or aseptic glenoid loosening following TSR.ConclusionsThe findings of this study showed satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with implant longevity for both HHR and TSR in patients with nontraumatic ONHH. The HHR group had a greater abduction angle compared with the TSR group.© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

22 keywords...

hide…