-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Validation of the Cough Quality-of-Life Questionnaire in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
- Noah Lechtzin, Marisa E Hilliard, and Maureen R Horton.
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. nlechtz@jhmi.edu
- Chest. 2013 Jun 1;143(6):1745-9.
BackgroundCough is a pervasive and disabling symptom of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and is an independent predictor of disease progression. The Cough Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) is a validated measure of cough-specific quality of life that could be used as an outcome measure in therapeutic trials for IPF. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the CQLQ in individuals with IPF.MethodsThe CQLQ was administered as an outcome within a previously published 27-week, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of thalidomide for cough in IPF. Participants were adults with IPF and chronic cough. A cough visual analog scale (VAS) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were administered to establish concurrent validity of the CQLQ.ResultsInternal consistency was high (Cronbach α > .70) for the CQLQ total and four of six subscale scores. The CQLQ total score demonstrated concurrent validity through significant correlations with scores on the cough VAS and SGRQ total and subscale scores (r range, 0.63-0.81; P < .05). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the CQLQ completed at baseline and after a therapeutic washout period at week 15 was 0.87, indicating very good test-retest reliability.ConclusionsThis study supports the use of the CQLQ as a valid and reliable instrument in IPF and should be used to assess cough-specific quality of life in therapeutic trials.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.