• A S Teirstein, M L Padilla, L R De Palo, and G J Schilero.
• Mount Sinai Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
• Mt. Sinai J. Med. 1996 Oct 1; 63 (5-6): 335341335-41.

BackgroundSarcoidosis continues to be shrouded by anecdotal misinformation which has gained credence by repetition. These myths have been developing for the past 50 years and continue to accumulate, despite remedial data. Among the most egregious myths are that sarcoidosis is a disease of Blacks, that the chest radiography is diagnostic of sarcoidosis, and has chronologic significance, that serum angiotensin converting enzyme and bronchoalveolar lavage are diagnostic of sarcoidosis and serve as guides to therapy, that the Kveim-Siltzbach test is not a reliable diagnostic test for sarcoidosis, that sarcoidosis is difficult to diagnose, and that sarcoidosis is tuberculosis.Methods And ResultsThe literature regarding these myths has been reviewed and supported by the experience with more than 10,000 patients with sarcoidosis who have been treated at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York.ConclusionsSarcoidosis occurs with varying frequency among all races. The chest radiograph typical of sarcoidosis can be mimicked by other granulomatous and neoplastic diseases. The classic radiographic stages, from 0 to 111, do not reflect the time course of sarcoidosis can be made relatively easily in most patients, but its etiology is still unknown.

11 keywords...

hide…