-
- Sonya Borrero, Cara Nikolajski, Keri L Rodriguez, Mitchell D Creinin, Robert M Arnold, and Said A Ibrahim.
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. borrerosp@upmc.edu
- J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar 1; 24 (3): 312319312-9.
BackgroundAfrican-American women have had higher rates of female sterilization compared to white women since its emergence as a contraceptive method. The reasons underlying this observed racial difference are unknown.ObjectivesThe goals of this study were to (1) explore what factors shape black and white women's decisions about tubal sterilization as a contraceptive method and (2) generate hypotheses about the relationship of race to the decision-making process.DesignWe conducted six focus groups stratified by tubal sterilization status and race. During each of the audio-recorded sessions, participants were asked to discuss reasons that women choose sterilization as a contraceptive method.ParticipantsThe participants of the study were 24 African-American women and 14 white women.ApproachTranscripts of the sessions were qualitatively analyzed with particular attention to factors that might be unique to each of the two racial groups.ResultsPersonal factors shaped black and white women's decisions regarding tubal sterilization. Preference for a convenient, highly effective contraceptive method was the main reason to get a tubal sterilization for women of both racial groups. We also identified socio-cultural differences that might explain why black women are more likely than white women to choose tubal sterilization over other contraceptive methods. An unanticipated, but clinically important, finding was that women often reported feeling that their doctors and the health-care system served as barriers to obtaining the desired procedure.ConclusionSocio-cultural differences may help explain why black and white women choose different contraceptive methods.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.