• Peter Behrendt, M T Berninger, G Thürig, J Dehoust, J Christensen, K-H Frosch, M Krause, and M J Hartel.
• Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Sportsorthopedics, Asklepios St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany. peter.behrendt.kiel@gmail.com.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun 1; 49 (3): 143314391433-1439.

IntroductionThe objective of this investigation was to compare different techniques to improve visualization and reduction in tibial plateau fractures involving the central lateral segments.MethodsMatched pairs of pre-fractured cadaveric tibial plateau fractures that include the central lateral segments were treated by either an anterolateral approach (supine) or PL approach (prone). Reduction was stepwise extended by additional fracturoscopy (FS), nanoscopy (NS) and lastly by epicondyle osteotomy (ECO). Reduction was analyzed by 3D scan and visualization of the lateral plateau was quantified.ResultsTen specimens (3 pairs 41B3.1, 2 pairs 41C3.3) were analyzed. Fracture steps involving the antero-latero-central (ALC) segment were insufficiently reduced after fluoroscopy using both approaches (AL 2.2 ± 1.2 mm vs PL 2.2 ± 1.0 mm, p 0.95). Additional NS and ECO achieved optimized fracture reduction in the ALC segment (NS AL 1.6 ± 1.3 mm vs PL 0.8 ± 0.9 mm, p 0.32). NS provided visualization of the entire lateral plateau (PL 102.9% ± 7.4, AL 108.8 ± 19.2%), while fracturoscopy only allowed visualization of the ALL segment and partially of PLL and ALC segments (PL 22.0 ± 23.4%, AL 29.7 ± 18.3%).ConclusionOptimized reduction of tibial head fractures with involvement of latero-central segments requires additional video-assisted reduction or extended approaches. Nanoscopy helps visualizing of the entire lateral plateau, when compared to fracturoscopy and may become a valuable reduction aid.© 2022. The Author(s).

19 keywords...

hide…