-
Comparative Study
Biomechanical analysis of anterior versus circumferential spinal reconstruction for various anatomic stages of tumor lesions.
- M Kanayama, J T Ng, B W Cunningham, K Abumi, K Kaneda, and P C McAfee.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. mkanayama@aol.com
- Spine. 1999 Mar 1; 24 (5): 445450445-50.
Study DesignSpinal reconstruction procedures for metastasis evaluated biomechanically using human cadaver specimens.ObjectiveTo investigate the stiffness of anterior versus circumferential spinal reconstructions for different anatomic stages of tumor lesions.Summary Of Background DataMetastatic tumors predominantly involve the vertebral bodies. Although anterior instrumentation and strut grafts provide excellent stability, it remains unclear to what extent vertebral destruction requires anterior reconstructions alone versus combined anterior and posterior procedures.MethodsTen human cadaveric thoracolumbar spines were used. The L1 vertebral body and posterior elements were resected sequentially based on Weinstein's anatomic zone classification for tumor lesions. Anterior reconstruction was performed between T12 and L2 using an iliac strut graft and the Kaneda SR system (AcroMed, Cleveland, OH). For circumferential reconstruction, the Cotrel-Dubousset hook and rod system was combined with the anterior reconstruction procedure. Experimental groups included the intact condition and five reconstruction stages: anterior reconstructions for corpectomy, subtotal and total spondylectomies, and circumferential reconstructions for subtotal and total spondylectomies. Nondestructive biomechanical testing was performed under four different loading modes.ResultsAll the reconstruction groups except anterior instrumentation alone for total spondylectomy returned stiffness to a level equivalent or higher to that of the intact spine. There were no statistical differences observed between anterior and circumferential reconstruction for subtotal spondylectomy. Anterior instrumentation alone for total spondylectomy did not restore stiffness to the intact level, and demonstrated significantly lower stiffness than that of circumferential reconstruction.ConclusionsFor corpectomy or subtotal spondylectomy, anterior reconstruction alone can provide stiffness equivalent to circumferential reconstruction. However, total spondylectomy significantly reduces the anterior reconstruction stiffness, suggesting the need for combined anterior and posterior procedures.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.