• Won Kim, Daeho Kim, Ho-Jun Seo, Sang-Yeol Lee, Seung-Ho Ryu, Jung-Bum Kim, Moon Yong Chung, Young Jin Koo, Seong Gon Ryu, Eui Jung Kim, Tae-Suk Kim, Hyun-Kook Lim, Jong-Min Woo, Jeong-Ho Chae, and Disaster Psychiatry Committee in Korean Academy of Anxiety Disorders.
• Department of Psychiatry and Stress Research Institute, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University, Seoul, Korea.
• J. Korean Med. Sci. 2009 Feb 1; 24 (1): 263126-31.

AbstractFor diagnosis and management of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the easily administered assessment tool is essential. Structured Interview for PTSD (SIP) is a validated, 17-item, simple measurement being used widely. We aimed to develop the Korean version of SIP (K-SIP) and investigated its psychometric properties. Ninety-three subjects with PTSD, 73 subjects with mood disorder or anxiety disorder as a psychiatric control group, and 88 subjects as a healthy control group were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed psychometric assessments that included the K-SIP, the Korean versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and other assessment tools. The K-SIP presented good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.92) and test-retest reliability (r=0.87). K-SIP showed strong correlations with CAPS (r=0.72). Among three groups including PTSD patients, psychiatric controls, and normal controls, there were significant differences in the K-SIP total score. The potential cut-off total score of K-SIP was 20 with highest diagnostic efficiency (91.9%). At this point, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 88.4%, respectively. Our result showed that K-SIP had good reliability and validity. We expect that K-SIP will be used as a simple but structured instrument for assessment of PTSD.

24 keywords...

hide…