-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jul 2023
Outcomes of temporary ventricular assist device: A pediatric institutional experience over 25 years.
- Junsang Cho, Andres A Fuentes-Baldemar, Hari P Tunuguntla, Joseph A Spinner, Sebastian C Tume, Athar M Qureshi, Jun Teruya, Jeffrey S Heinle, and Iki Adachi.
- Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
- J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2023 Jul 1; 166 (1): 201211.e2201-211.e2.
BackgroundThere are scarce data describing outcomes of pediatric temporary ventricular assist device support.MethodsA retrospective single-center study was conducted to review clinical outcomes of all consecutive patients with temporary ventricular assist device between 1996 and 2021. Given the complex clinical course in some patients requiring multiple temporary ventricular assist device runs, outcome analysis was based on "encounters" (hospitalizations with temporary ventricular assist device, regardless of the number of devices used).ResultsIn total, 126 temporary ventricular assist devices were implanted in 108 patients, resulting in a total of 114 encounters: 70 (61%) extracorporeal centrifugal pumps and 44 (39%) catheter-based axial pumps. The median (range) age and weight at temporary ventricular assist device implant were 10.1 years (1 day to 42.8 years) and 33.6 (2.5-128) kg, respectively. Underlying etiologies of cardiac dysfunction were cardiomyopathy (34, 30%), cardiac transplant graft dysfunction (29, 25%), congenital heart disease (23, 20%; 9 single ventricle), myocarditis (22, 19%), and other (6, 5%). Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile was 1 in 75 (66%) and 2 in 39 (34%). Support configuration was left ventricular assist device (104, including 9 systemic ventricular assist devices), right ventricular assist device (5), and biventricular assist device (5). The median (range) support duration was 6 (1-61) days. Overall, 97 (85%) encounters reached a positive primary end point: bridge-to-recovery (55), bridge-to-bridge (31), and bridge-to-transplant directly with temporary ventricular assist device (11). Seventeen (15%) encounters resulted in death during temporary ventricular assist device support: multiorgan failure (12), stroke (4), and cardiac arrest (1). The 6-month survivals with catheter-based axial pumps and extracorporeal centrifugal pumps were 84% (95% confidence interval, 74-96) and 67% (95% confidence interval, 57-79), respectively (P = .08). The 1- and 5-year survivals of 82 hospital survivors were 90% and 84%, respectively.ConclusionsThis study suggests temporary ventricular assist device support is feasible in children with favorable outcomes.Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.